One of the best posts on trading that I've encountered inward years is Brandt's analysis of how randomness affects trading profitability. The same exact trading methodology tin yield winning or losing outcomes over a express fourth dimension horizon merely due to the random strings of winning in addition to losing trades. This is demonstrated extremely good past times Brandt's post, where he assumes a given win charge per unit of measurement in addition to ratio of average winning size to losing size in addition to therefore shows how those metrics tin Pb to profitability or unprofitability over a run of 100 trades.
There are 2 of import implications of Brandt's analysis:
1) If you lot ramp upwards your trading size, the increased risk over a random serial of losing trades tin devastate your account. Your trading size should non live a constituent of about high target furnish that you lot promise to make, but rather a constituent of the random strings of losers that you lot tin survive.
2) Just because you're going through a losing menses doesn't hateful you're trading a losing methodology. Changing audio methods inward the middle of a random string of losing trades would live similar a batter changing his swing afterwards bang out a few times. That is what helps plough normal setbacks into prolonged mental in addition to functioning slumps.
The bottom trouble is that nosotros tin read far equally good much into short-term trading outcomes. Losing trades don't necessarily hateful we're trading poorly in addition to winning trades don't necessarily advise that nosotros own got a hot hand. We tin gain cognition from analytical mistakes in addition to creative insights, but it's also of import to retain the wisdom that sometimes nosotros volition merchandise good in addition to lose in addition to other times nosotros tin merchandise poorly in addition to win.
Not every move--of markets, or of profit/loss--is meaningful.
Further Reading: Lessons From a Successful Trader
.
No comments:
Post a Comment