Ted is also an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Organizational Sciences at George Washington University together with has served equally a Senior Research Director for the Gallup Organization. My interview amongst Ted volition endure inwards several installments, equally he had a groovy bargain to share.
Brett: Hi, Ted. Perhaps you lot tin say readers a trivial chip close yourself together with your areas of involvement equally a researcher together with psychologist.
Ted: Sure, cheers for this conversation Brett! My get upwards is Ted Hayes together with I am a inquiry psychologist based inwards Northern Virginia. My interests are inwards the nature of human performance, peculiarly amidst higher performing people. The ane enquiry I wishing to response is, what is it that makes people successful?
My offset internship was to assistance written report predictors of success for USA Navy Explosive Ordinance Disposal divers. Talk close a high-stakes environment! And inwards that written report nosotros establish that measurable aspects of personality predicted preparation success. I was hooked on psychological criterion from hence on.
Performance amidst traders is unlike from functioning amidst EOD divers but the same types of human functioning attributes are linked to positive outcomes. That’s ane of the exciting parts of my work.
Brett: What are unopen to of the most of import factors that create upwards one's heed a person's satisfaction together with functioning inwards a career field?
Ted: I’ll get down past times defining unopen to price to ensure that nosotros (you, me, the readers of your blog) receive got a mutual frame of reference.
Vocational interests are expressions of what an private finds rewarding inwards price of social interaction, external rewards (i.e. remuneration) together with social status, together with a feel of personal meaning. For example, many people acquire into finance or trading because they similar the potential for high income; an event would endure Charles Schwab. The same type of people, interestingly, would brand groovy news analysts, together with inwards fact the traders together with news analysts I’ve worked amongst receive got rattling similar talent sets. But spell the coin sure could together with should endure a element inwards vocational choice, you, Brett, receive got written close how trading involves ‘the rage to master’ — I dear that term. So ane could uncovering trading to endure a rewarding career because of the wishing for high income but maybe you’ll endure happier longer term because you lot wishing to empathise markets, bask existence the main of your ain fate, uncovering satisfaction inwards calculating the correct endangerment ratios.
In short, you lot volition endure happy inwards a plain if you lot empathise your motivations together with hence are able to tally your motivations to an surroundings that volition vantage those motivations. Day traders powerfulness endure to a greater extent than at ane indicate of the scale spell prop-desk traders at banks would endure at unopen to other point. Both groups would endure trading but maybe for unlike reasons, hence satisfaction is a personal feel of accomplishment based on agreement what makes you lot ‘tick.’
Brett: So what you're happy amongst together with what you lot do good could endure unlike things.
Ted: Yes, functioning is rattling unlike from satisfaction. For example, if you lot wishing to run a macro fund but you’re starting out inwards solar daytime trading, well, that won’t concluding long. So that’s why from a inquiry perspective nosotros expand the toolkit beyond vocational interests to stair out the psychology of human performance.
Over 100 years of world-wide professionally conducted empirical inquiry on human performance, combined amongst a few to a greater extent than decades of written report on human cognition, could endure summarized equally follows:
Cognitive powerfulness enables ane to brand feel of data, integrate novel information amongst previously learned information, together with cry back information to create novel run products. But earlier your readers amongst perfect SAT scores or A-level exams get down congratulating themselves, let’s admit that existence amidst “the smartest guys inwards the room” doesn’t hateful you’ll endure successful; only await at what high IQ did for Enron. And equally you lot together with I know from our run amongst traders, a lot of successful traders think people amongst academic smarts are, well, stupid. What distinguishes “smart” from “successful” is practiced decision-making. So the enquiry is, why together with how do people brand practiced decisions?
Two completely unlike strains of psychology converge to address making practiced decisions. First, inquiry together with thinking inwards cognitive psychology has converged on the two-stage model for judgment together with conclusion making — equally Daniel Kahneman puts it inwards his book’s title, “Thinking, Fast together with Slow.” The Canadian psychologist Keith Stanovich also poses a two-stage model of rationality inwards which in that place are snap (‘fast’) decisions, which are prone to bias together with heuristics, together with deliberate (‘slow’) decisions, which inwards theory are based on data, dependent plain to de-biasing, together with ultimately to a greater extent than “rational.”
Brett: So functioning is tied to our abilities to procedure information.
Ted: Yes, but this is solely business office of the picture. One could ask, do people actually solely brand judgments based on information together with algorithms? Of course of education not. Deliberations together with decisions reverberate our tendencies, preferences, allegiances, anxieties, values, biases, temperament, together with motives, or, inwards other words, our personalities.
Personality drives behavior, peculiarly inwards run settings. World-wide empirical inquiry over the bridge of 100 years has settled this number at to the lowest degree to that extent.
Personality reflects your interests, temperament, values, etc. equally filtered past times your social skills. In other words, your reputation is a proxy for your personality. In fact electrical flow inquiry shows that other people’s ratings of you lot on personality tests are ameliorate predictors of your run functioning than are your ain personality show ratings of yourself.
************
Let's footstep dorsum for a 2d together with reverberate on what Ted is proposing. He is identifying ii broad factors that contribute to performance: cognitive powerfulness together with personality. Both are crucially involved inwards decision-making. Cognitive powerfulness breaks downwardly into fast thinking--the sort of designing recognition nosotros run across amidst successful short-term traders--and slow, deep thinking. That's the sort of analysis that nosotros run across amidst global macro portfolio managers. It is hard to imagine that a trader tin endure successful without having at to the lowest degree ane of those areas well-developed.
On the other hand, all the skills together with knowledge inwards the basis volition non interpret into functioning if those cognitive assets are non supported past times personality traits. As Ted points out, nosotros all know rattling smart people who are non tiptop aeroplane performers--in markets or elsewhere. It is the powerfulness of personality traits to channel cognitive powerfulness that contributes to basis degree performance.
In the adjacent segment of the interview, Ted volition shed low-cal on the specific personality traits that are associated amongst functioning success.
Further Reading: The Best Predictor of Trading Success
.
